spare_parts: pooh girl: spare_parts:OK, so if they are stuck, who is forcing them to drive at 75MPH? Is that more clear? Part of my daily commute is on the interstate with the speed limit being 65 mph and I go close to 70 mph. The other half of my trip ranges from 45mph to 55 mph based upon the speed limits in the different areas. So, how much more fuel am I using at the higher speed? I thought you get better mileage on the highway. Actually, isn't that correct highway miles are better. The point of diminished fuel economy is different for different vehicles. In city driving, stop and go, it's the mass of the vehicle that plays the biggest role in reducing fuel economy. If it's a large vehicle and you try to accelerate that vehicle quickly, you burn more fuel than moving a smaller, lighter vehicle. The more stops you have, the more energy you consume.As you transition to highway speeds, it's not the mass of the vehicle that matters as much as aerodynamic drag. Drag increases as a square if I recally my physics correctly.If you look at the following paper, while about tractor trailer trucks, the physics applies to cars as well, you can see that at about 50MPH for those vehicles, the horsepower to overcome drag matches the horsepower to overcome things like friction and other mechanical losses. You can also see how much faster the curve for aerodynamic losses increases, compared to other factors.If you look at this page: http://gas2.org/2008/03/15/car-and-driver-increase-pinto-fuel-economy-with-11-of-ecomods/one will see that about 1/2 of the modifications have to do with the aerodynamics of the car. The air dam keeping air from under the car, as wellas the radiator block and the smooth front end all contribute significantly to highway fuel economy, while the others apply in both city and highway economy.Of course, going slower is the 100% free way of reducing losses to aerodynamic factors.
pooh girl: spare_parts:OK, so if they are stuck, who is forcing them to drive at 75MPH? Is that more clear? Part of my daily commute is on the interstate with the speed limit being 65 mph and I go close to 70 mph. The other half of my trip ranges from 45mph to 55 mph based upon the speed limits in the different areas. So, how much more fuel am I using at the higher speed? I thought you get better mileage on the highway. Actually, isn't that correct highway miles are better.
spare_parts:OK, so if they are stuck, who is forcing them to drive at 75MPH? Is that more clear?
So, how much more fuel am I using at the higher speed? I thought you get better mileage on the highway. Actually, isn't that correct highway miles are better.
Thought it was interesting too that the folks that study this even can come up with ways in the design of semi trucks to have better fuel usage.
So, when one buys a car (like mine) that states 34 mpg highway miles at what speed have they determined that calculation?
I don't have a problem with people SUGGESTING that others drive more fuel effecient vehicles, but to demand or somehow suggest selfishness of those who drive a gas guzzler, to me that is socialism. My wife and I have 3 pickup trucks. We live out in the country and have a couple of horses which we occasionally transport. Imagine me pulling a horse trailer with a mini cooper lol. Plus, we are in decent financial shape and 2 of the trucks are paid for. If people would get rid of their car payments, you'd be able to by alot of fuel. There is plenty of oil out there, it's just a matter of drilling for it and having enough refineries to process it. Also some of the rising food prices are due to ethanol production. IMO ethanol is waaay over rated. Also the gov't subsidizes it. (if it was so great, why would it need gov't subsidies?).
spare_parts: Seeking His Path: Lostsomuch:Why are oil companies making millions in record profits in the last two years??? I didn't read the entire post yet, but the real fact of the matter is that Exxon/Mobil has been averaging more than $10 billion in profit per quarter for more than 2 years. That equates to over $110 million in profit per day. This is profit, not total revenue. Yet oil companies have some of the worst Return on Investment historically. It's probably better now, if they actually have oil and don't just buy it on the market.No one asks how much XOM spent to make 110 million in profit/day. If they are spending 1.1billion, that's ONLY a 10% return.It's a lot of money for profit, but as a percentage, it's not as good a return on your investment as other industries such as telecom, computers, etc that have closer to 30-50% return on the investment. Sure, they don't do the volume of business an oil company does, but they make more per dollar you've invested with them on average.
Seeking His Path: Lostsomuch:Why are oil companies making millions in record profits in the last two years??? I didn't read the entire post yet, but the real fact of the matter is that Exxon/Mobil has been averaging more than $10 billion in profit per quarter for more than 2 years. That equates to over $110 million in profit per day. This is profit, not total revenue.
Lostsomuch:Why are oil companies making millions in record profits in the last two years???
I didn't read the entire post yet, but the real fact of the matter is that Exxon/Mobil has been averaging more than $10 billion in profit per quarter for more than 2 years. That equates to over $110 million in profit per day. This is profit, not total revenue.
And if Exxon cut their price by 75 cents a gallon they would make approximately $28 billion in profits in a year instead of $40 billion. Oh my, how would they ever afford to live?
spare_parts:Forgot the 2nd linkhttp://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=ccab9e991dc3344fff9261057c8e6e08&rgn=div5&view=text&node=40:29.0.1.4.41&idno=40]#40:29.0.1.4.41.6.13.21.32
Seeking His Path:And if Exxon cut their price by 75 cents a gallon they would make approximately $28 billion in profits in a year instead of $40 billion. Oh my, how would they ever afford to live?
Ok, so oil execs had a hearing before congress. Point blank they said the days of cheap gas are gone. They said there will be a time very soon when the american people will think that $5.00 per gallon gas is cheap.
This country is in a recession. Economists can sugar coat it how ever they want. The stock market can't even keep what it gains for the week. What we are seeing now with gas, food, foreclosers etc. is just the tip of the iceberg. It will get worse. Much, much worse.
All these examples do NOT imply that gasoline is cheap; it just
illustrates how outrageous some prices are....
You will be really shocked by the last one!
(At least, I was...)
Compared with Gasoline......
Think a gallon of gas is expensive?
This makes one think, and also puts things in perspective to other
things we buy.
Diet Snapple 16 oz $1.29 .... $10.32 per gallon
Lipton Ice Tea 16 oz $1.19 ..........$9.52 per gallon
Gatorade 20 oz $1.59 .... $10.17 per gallon
Ocean Spray 16 oz $1.25 ......... $10.00 per gallon
Brake Fluid 12 oz $3.15 ....... $33.60 per gallon
< /B>
Vick's Nyquil 6 oz $8.35 .... $178.13 per gallon
Pepto Bismol 4 oz $3.85 .. $123.20 per gallon
Whiteout 7 oz $1.39 ....... . $25.42 per gallon
Scope 1.5 oz $0.99 .....$84.48 per gallon
And this is the REAL KICKER...
Evian water 9 oz $1.49..$21.19 per gallon!
$21.19 for WATER and the
buyers don't even know the source
(Evian spelled backwards is Naive.)
Ever wonder why printers are so cheap?
So they have you hooked for the ink.
Someone calculated the cost of the ink at...............
(you won't believe it....but it is true........)
$5,200 a gal. (five thousand two hundred dollars)
So, the next time you're at the pump,be glad your car doesn't run on
water, Scope, or Whiteout, Pepto Bismol, Nyquil or God forbid, Printer
Ink!
Just a little humor to help ease the pain of your next trip to the
pump...
And - If you don't pass this along to at least one person,
your muffler will fall off!!
Okay, your muffler won't really fall off...but, you might run out of
toilet paper
GCS - a good substitute for TP is leaves ;-). If you are outside, you can also use a rock or snow - whatever happens to be at hand!
(I used to teach back country travel for a mountaineering group. As the female of the two person teaching team, I always got to teach "potty training")
Gabby50:GCS - a good substitute for TP is leaves ;-). If you are outside, you can also use a rock or snow - whatever happens to be at hand! (I used to teach back country travel for a mountaineering group. As the female of the two person teaching team, I always got to teach "potty training")